Optimal LP Width in Bull/Bear Markets
We analyzed simulated LP performance on ETH-USDC 0.3% pool. Results were surprising: the optimal width was wider than expected! π’
- What's the optimal width for max returns?
- How does that change for π vs π» markets?
Find out π
LP Strategyβ
The strategy is simple:
- π¦ LP around the current ETH price with Β±X% width
- βοΈ Rebalance your LP position after a day, week, or month (you pick)
- π΅ Collect & compound your fees!
Our analysis includes >1.5 years of data (Jun 2021 - Jan 2023) on 5 different range factors:
- Β±5% (r = 1.05)
- Β±20% (r = 1.2)
- Β±50% (r = 1.5)
- Β±75% (r = 1.75)
- β (UniV2 full-range, r = 1000)
1/13 Read our latest #ResearchBites from @brandonly1000 of the@Panoptic_xyz research team!
β Panoptic (@Panoptic_xyz) January 18, 2023
=====
How do you LP on UniV3 with a Β±% range?
E.g. if you wanted Β±30% should you do:
1) Lower: P * 70%
Upper: P * 130%
or
2) Lower: P / 1.3
Upper: P * 1.3
Let's find out!π pic.twitter.com/QChXAuIonz
Which one did best?π€
Full Period Resultsβ
For the FULL period (Jun 2021 - Jan 2023):
- Daily rebalancing: r* = β (full range)
- Weekly rebalancing: r* = 1.5
- Monthly rebalancing: r* = β (full range)
LPs end up w/negative returns for this pool, but were raking in $ during the bull market (~40% returns in < 6 months)
Bull Market Resultsβ
For the π market (Jun 2021 - Mar 2022):
- Daily rebalancing: r* = 1.5 - β
- Weekly rebalancing: r* = 1.5
- Monthly rebalancing: r* = 1.75
LPs end up positive! (~20% returns in 10 months)
Bear Market Resultsβ
For the π» market (Apr 2022 - Jan 2023):
- Daily rebalancing: r* = β
- Weekly rebalancing: r* = 1.75 - β
- Monthly rebalancing: r* = β
LPs end up negative (-24% returns in 10 months, but compare that to -55% returns on ETH!)
During π market, optimal range was tighter (r = 1.5 - 1.75). But during π» market, optimal range was wider (r = 1.75 - β). Here's why π
Summaryβ
Tight range:
- π€ "Greedy"
- π More fees! (~6,000% cumulative fees in 1.5 years, r = 1.05)
- π© Buy losing asset faster, sell winning asset faster
Wide range:
- π¦Ί "Safe"
- π Buy losing asset slower, sell winning asset slower
- π© Less fees (16% cumulative fees, r = β)
There's a tradeoff in choosing r:
- β¬οΈ fees β¬οΈ payoffs or
- β¬οΈ fees β¬οΈ payoffs
@guil_lambert has a good "Guide For Choosing Optimal Uniswap V3 LP Positions" π
- β Gives probability of landing ITM
- β Doesn't account for where we land ITM
- β Doesn't account for time spent ITM
Caveats:
- β½ Ignores gas & rebalancing fees
- π Assumes fees/returns compound day-over-day
- β οΈ Past performance is no guarantee of future results!
Questions:
- π What about other pools? (π¦, βΏ, SHIB, ...)
- βοΈ What about stablecoin pools?
Well it turns out ALL performed extremely well: 700% returns for the long/vanilla LP strategy over the past 2 years!
β Guillaume Lambert | lambert.eth | π¦π (@guil_lambert) January 27, 2023
Even the short strategy gained 400%
What's going on here? Why are returns so high? pic.twitter.com/YJ17pSFs3D
Disclaimer:
- π’ None of this should be taken as financial advice.
- β οΈ Past performance is no guarantee of future results!